Computational and Experimental Modal Analysis of a Clamped-Free Bar

Timothy Cameron, Ph.D.

Daniel Russell

Mechanical Engineering

Applied Physics


GMI Engineering & Management Institute
Flint, MI, 48504


I. Introduction

In this lab exercise you will analyze the modes of vibration of a clamped-free bar. Firstly, you will calculate the frequencies and modeshapes of bending and torsional modes for the bar analytically. Secondly, you will predict the vibratory behavior of the clamped bar computationally using finite element analysis. Thirdly, using the experimental technique of modal analysis with an impact hammer, you will measure the bar's the vibratory behavior. This lab is by no means a complete coverage of all the components of modal analysis, or of finite element analysis. It is merely intended to introduce you to the possibilities that such tools offer.

II. Theoretical Frequencies for a Clamped-Free Bar

A. Bending modes

A rectangular bar clamped at one end and free at the other end is a simple enough vibrating system that the equations of motion may be solved analytically. Usually one starts from an analysis of Newton's second law and the forces and moments acting on a beam segment and derives an equation of motion. Such a derivation, with application of the appropriate boundary conditions for clamped and free ends, may be found in section 3.11 of {\sl Fundamentals of Acoustics}, 3rd Ed., Kinsler, Frey, Coppens, and Sanders (J.\ Wiley \& Sons, 1982).

The resulting allowed frequencies for bending motion are

$$ f_n = {{\pi c \kappa} \over {8L^2}}(1.194^2,\ 2.988^2,\ 5^2,\ 7^2,\ ...(2n-1)^2) \EQN bend1 $$

where for a beam with a rectangular cross section $\kappa \!=\! h/\sqrt{12}$ with $h$ being the beam thickness and $L$ being the beam length. The quantity $c \!=\! \sqrt{E \over \rho}$ is the speed of longitudinal waves in the beam. $E$ and $\rho$ are the Young's modulus and density of the beam. Notice that the higher frequencies are not harmonics of the fundamental (that is, higher frequencies are not integer multiples of the fundamental $n\!=\!1$).

B. Torsional modes

The frequencies of torsional modes of a rectangular bar with a width to thickness ratio greater than six, and which is clamped at one end and free at the other end, may be approximated by $$ f_n = {(2n-1) \over 4 L}\,{2 h \over w}\sqrt{G \over \rho} \EQN torsional $$ where $L$ is the length, $h$ is the thickness, $w$ is the width, $\rho$ is the density, and $G$ is the shear modulus of the bar. The shear modulus is related to Young's modulus by $G\!=\! E/2(1 + \sigma)$, where $\sigma$ is Poisson's ratio.

III. Experimental Modal Analysis Tools

Modal analysis is simply an experimental analysis of the modal behavior of a structure. The structure is set into vibration by a mechanical shaker or an impact hammer at one more points, and the response (displacement, velocity, or acceleration) of the structure is measured at one or more points. There are many variations on how to collect data, as well as many discussions of the theory behind the experimental technique. In this lab we will be using a fixed response impulse modal analysis. The structure will be excited by impact with a hammer. The impact will be applied at a number of points over the surface of the structure, and the structural response will be measured using an accelerometer at one (fixed) point. The transfer function (ratio of response to force) at this point will be measured for each impact point. A computer software package (SMS Star Modal$^{\rm TM}$) will be used to curve fit the resulting data and produce animations corresponding to the various vibrating modes of the structure.

A. Accelerometers

An accelerometer is a linear seismic transducer which produces an electric charge proportional to the applied acceleration. A simple model of an accelerometer is shown in \Fig{accelerometer1}(a). A mass is supported on a piece of piezoelectric ceramic crystal which is fastened to the frame of the transducer body. Piezoelectric materials have the property that if they are compressed or sheared, they produce an electric potential between their extremities, and this electric potential is proportional to the amount of compression or shear. As the frame experiences an upward acceleration it also experiences a displacement. Because the mass is attached to the frame through the spring-like piezoelectric element, the resulting displacement it experiences is of different phase and amplitude than the displacement of the frame. This relative displacement between the frame and mass causes the piezoelectric crystal to be compressed, giving off a voltage proportional to the acceleration of the frame.

B. Impact hammers

An impact hammer is simply a hammer with various attachable masses and tips which serve to extend the frequency and force ranges of the impact. Impact hammers come in many sizes, ranging from tiny pencil-sized hammers to large sledge hammers. An integral part of the hammer is a force transducer, which uses the compression of a piezoelectric crystal to detect the magnitude of the force felt by the hammer when it strikes a structure. According to Newton's third law, this force must be equal and opposite to the force experienced by the structure. The magnitude of the force is determined by the mass of the hammer head and the velocity with which it is moving when it hits the structure. When operated by hand, it is usually easier to vary the velocity, so the force level may be adjusted by changing the mass of the hammer head.

The frequency range of excitation provided by a hammer is determined by the stiffness of the hammer-structure contact surfaces and the mass of the hammer head. There is a hammer-structure system resonance at a frequency given by $$ f_c = \sqrt{\hbox{contact stiffness} \over \hbox{impactor mass}} $$ above which it is difficult to deliver energy into the test structure. When the hammer hits the test structure, the resulting force pulse has a general sine-squared shape, as shown in \Fig{hammerhit}(a). The frequency spectrum of such an impulse is shown in \Fig{hammerhit}(b); the spectrum is essentially flat up to a certain frequency ($f_c$) after which it falls off significantly. There is a direct relationship between the duration of the impact and the cutoff frequency $f_c$; in order to raise the cutoff frequency one must shorten the impact duration. The impact duration is related to the stiffness (not hardness) of the contacting surfaces and to the mass of the hammer head. Stiffer surfaces and lighter hammers yield higher frequency ranges. Compliant surfaces and heavy hammers yield lower frequency ranges. Generally, you should use the softest tip possible; using too stiff a tip will result in energy being input into vibrations outside the frequency range of interest at the expense of vibrations within the desired frequency range.

The greatest difficulty in using an impact hammer to excite a structure is ensuring that each impact is essentially the same as all previous hits, not only in magnitude, but also in position and orientation to the normal to the surface. In addition, it is very important to avoid "double hits" which result when the hammer bounces against the surface. Double hits cause significant signal processing problems and contaminate measured data.

C. Frequency Analyzer

D. Software Package

IV. Finite Element Analysis

Finite element analysis is a computational solution of the vibration of a complex structure, performed by breaking the structure up into finite elements which are connected according to a defined mesh. There are books and books written about the finite element method, and even a couple of courses covering finite element techniques here at GMI. This lab is not an introduction to FEA. You will, however, use a finite element program to verify the modal analysis measurements you make. While there are many powerful finite element programs available in industry, and at GMI (IDEAS, ANSYS, NASTRAN, SYSNOISE) most of these programs have a steep learning curve. One simple program which is available on most of the PC's on the GMI campus is {\it weCan for Windows}; this lab will step you through this program in order to calculate the mode shapes and frequencies for a clamped-free bar.

Finite element analysis is also a very important tool in vibration analysis, and it is often used hand in hand with modal analysis. In fact, when studying a complex structure, it is generally a good idea to first perform a finite element analysis of a rough approximation of the structure. This not only indicates what types of motion and frequencies one might look for, but more importantly, it helps identify good and bad locations for accelerometer placement for modal analysis. If an accelerometer is placed at a location on the structure that does not vibrate at a particular frequency, then a modal analysis may not yield any useful data. Finite element analysis is a good preliminary computational tool to precede an experimental modal analysis.

V. Equipment

VI. Procedure and Analysis

A. Theoretical frequencies

B. Modal analysis

1. Analyzer and equipment setup

2. Data acquisition using impact hammer

Postprocessing of data using Star Modal software

C. Finite element analysis using weCan for Windows

D. Analysis

  • You should have three sets of frequencies and mode data: Theoretical calculations, Modal Analysis, and Finite Analysis. Using tables and/or plots you should be able to compare values for the frequencies of the bending and torsional modes obtained via the three methods. You should also be able to compare the results for the mode shapes from modal analysis and finite element analysis.

    VII. References

    1. Kinsler, Frey, Coppens, and Sanders, Fundamentals of Acoustics, Third Edition, (John Wiley \& Sons, 1982) Chapter 3.
    2. Shock \& Vibration Handbook, Third Edition, Edited by Cyril M. Harris, (McGraw-Hill, 1988), Chapters 12 and 21.
    3. Broch, Mechanical Vibration and Shock Measurements, 2nd Edition, (Brüel & Kjær, 1984).
    4. Measuring Vibration,Brüel & Kjær booklet, (1982).
    5. Ewins, Modal Testing: Theory and Practice, (Research Studies Press Ltd., 1984).
    6. W. G. Halvorsen and D. L. Brown, "Impulse Technique for Structural Frequency Response," Sound and Vibration, pp. 8-21, (November 1977).
    7. D. Corelli and D. L. Brown, "Impact Testing Considerations," unpublished paper
    8. K. Blakely, "Using Finite Element Data to Set Up Modal Tests," Sound and Vibration, pp.16-23, (June, 1989).

    Appendix: Setting up the HP FFT Analyzer for Modal Analysis